Genko 原稿Back to edition

Scaling Laws for Tool-Use Agents via Controllable Environment Synthesis

The paper maps how synthetic data composition shapes tool-use agent generalization. Scaling tool and database diversity beats adding tasks as budgets grow.

The explainer · 283 words

The claim

The paper derives a scaling law for synthetic tool-use data, and diversity beats volume.

The problem

Tool-use agents learn from synthetically generated environments rather than live traffic.

How the composition of those environments shapes generalization was not measured.

Every team must still spend one fixed data budget across tasks, tools, and databases.

How it works

SynthAPI generates tool-use environments along three controllable axes.

The axes are tools, tasks, and the databases on which the tools operate.

The authors vary each axis across 458,752 generated tasks in total.

They train 849 separate models spanning four different parameter sizes.

A fitted scaling law predicts downstream generalization from scale and composition.

Figures

How SynthAPI builds the dataThree controls, then one scaling law.

Step 1 of 5

Fix the budget

Choose how many tasks the pipeline may generate in total.

Where the budget goesHow the paper ranks the three ways to scale.

Data budget choice

More tasks

Adding tasks helps less than diversity once budgets grow.

What changes

At larger data budgets, tool and database diversity beats adding tasks.

Increasing task complexity yields larger gains than repeating easier tasks.

Agents trained this way beat prior synthetic data work on four benchmarks.

Limits

The law covers environments produced by this specific pipeline.

Real production tool traffic may shift the trade-offs.

The paper reports no cost figures for generating the data.

Source · arXiv

More from this edition