Genko 原稿Back to edition

SCARL: Sequence Confidence-Aligned Reinforcement Learning

RLVR treats a lucky success and a confident one the same. SCARL reshapes each advantage by the confidence gap: +2.4 Pass@32 over DAPO on Qwen3-4B-Base.

The explainer · 252 words

The claim

SCARL ties each RLVR advantage to the policy confidence behind it.

The problem

RLVR rewards success but ignores how confident the policy was.

A lucky find and a certain answer earn the same update.

Confident errors get no extra correction.

How it works

SCARL measures the gap between group-relative confidence and outcome.

It reshapes each advantage by that alignment gap.

Advantages are never re-signed, only redistributed.

Misaligned samples absorb most of the update force.

Repairing the gap also slows entropy collapse.

Figures

Where the update force goesSame advantage, different confidence.
Confidence matches outcome · Force stays lowConfidence contradicts outcome · Force concentrates here
The answer matched how sure the policy was.
Misaligned samples absorb the update force.

50% Confidence contradicts outcome · 50% Confidence matches outcome

Reported effect on Qwen3-4B-BaseSCARL against nine compute-matched methods.

SCARL result

Average Pass@32

2.4 points above DAPO.

Advantage without and with confidenceWhat changes when the gap is repaired.

Plain advantage

  • Reward alone sets the update size.
  • Confidence plays no part in it.
  • Exploratory errors get little correction.

What changes

On Qwen3-4B-Base, average Pass@32 rises 2.4 points over DAPO.

It improves 14 of 16 settings across estimators and backbones.

Policy entropy stays healthy while confidence separates from correctness.

Limits

The headline gain is 2.4 points on one model family.

The method adds one hyperparameter to tune.

It adds no extra forward passes.

Source · arXiv

More from this edition