Genko 原稿Back to edition

Incentivizing Self-Learning in Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning

RL that rewards textbook study raised proof accuracy from 51.5% to 79.5%. Gains also hold on out-of-domain subjects.

The explainer · 256 words

The claim

RL rewards let a model study a textbook on its own and solve harder proofs.

The problem

Knowledge-intensive tasks need new knowledge, not just retrieval.

Fixed retrieval pipelines hand the model a preassembled context.

Problem solving in unfamiliar domains needs study and reasoning together.

How it works

The task is textbook-based mathematical proof writing with graded exercises.

Reference solutions are withheld, so the model must study first.

A BookNavigator interface lets the model browse the long-form textbook.

Reinforcement learning rewards each fine-grained step of the study process.

The model learns to retrieve, read and apply the right principles.

Figures

Proof accuracy with textbook studyIntern-S2-Preview-35B before and after RL training.
Base model · 51.5%After RL self-learning · 79.5%
Without the self-learning reward.
Same model, solutions still withheld.

50% After RL self-learning · 50% Base model

One study cycleThe loop that the reward shaped.

Step 1 of 4

Open the textbook

The model browses long-form exposition.

Where the method helpedReported gains over the base model.

Benchmark

Proof accuracy

From 51.5% to 79.5%.

What changes

Proof accuracy rises from 51.5% to 79.5% on Intern-S2-Preview-35B.

The method beats textbook-free and fixed-retrieval RL baselines on the same task.

Long-context benchmarks improve by 1.7 and 2.3 points over the base model.

Limits

Results come from a single 35B model working on textbook subjects.

The task family is mathematical proofs drawn from textbooks, not open problems.

The paper reports no results outside textbook study and long-context settings.

Source · arXiv

More from this edition