Genko 原稿Back to edition

Grounding Multimodal Reasoning with Evidence-Ablated Negatives

Evidence-ablated negatives stop RLVR models from answering without reading the image. Masked patches expose shortcuts the policy then suppresses.

The explainer · 268 words

The claim

Evidence-ablated negatives stop RLVR models from answering without reading the image.

The problem

RLVR improves multimodal reasoning with verifiable rewards.

Outcome rewards can come from language priors instead of the image.

Good negatives must stay plausible while exposing the shortcut.

How it works

EVAN ranks examples by image information gain.

It masks the most discriminative patches of the image.

The current policy then answers from language priors alone.

Those answers enter optimization as bounded auxiliary signals.

A mixed-ranking strategy keeps the training data diverse.

Figures

How a negative is builtOne image is damaged on purpose.

Step 1 of 4

Rank by visual dependence

A scaled image information gain metric picks examples.

Reward, two sourcesWhat the positive reward can come from.

Outcome reward only

  • A right answer can come from language priors.
  • Visual grounding is optional to succeed.
What the negative showsEach position changes the training signal.

Evidence in the image

Fully visible

The policy may still answer from priors.

What changes

Shortcut learning is penalized while RL training stays stable.

Results beat strong RLVR baselines on multimodal reasoning benchmarks.

Limits

The abstract reports no single numeric gain.

Gains are shown across benchmarks the authors selected.

The method is evaluated on benchmarks, not deployed systems.

Source · arXiv

More from this edition